As the name so generously implies,
an online “genre generator” gives rise, at random, to a set of reproducible conventions
that pertain to a specific genre; in this case, the chosen genres are computer
science research papers, comic strips, and memes.
These computer science research
papers (although I make no claim that I understand what they are discussing whatsoever)
all appear to follow very precise patterns, from the way the subject matter is
presented to the formulaic graphs and flowcharts found in their bodies. Each
research paper begins in the exact same way: a dark, bold title followed by the
author’s name and a brief abstract, which allows the reader some insight into
what the paper’s objective(s) is/are. These papers are littered with specific jargon
that an audience with no background in computer science has no hope of
understanding (I am a real-life model of this statement). For instance, “Cyberinformaticians
have complete control over the server daemon, which of course is necessary so
that Boolean logic can be made pseudorandom, certifiable, and amphibious,”
means next to nothing to me. However, because a computer science research paper
is geared toward a very specific audience, a person with no knowledge in the
matter can make no statements to disclaim its legitimacy. The phrasing of the
sentences throughout the paper tend to be very short and concise, perhaps so as
to increase the clarity for the readers. If we take a step back and analyze the
paper from a broader perspective, we find that each portion of the paper begins
with a bold heading (i.e. Table of Contents, Introduction, Related Works,
etc.), contains multiple non-textual figures, such as graphs and flowcharts, that
are labeled and briefly described, and lastly, have a list of references at the
very end.
On a completely
different spectrum of genres, comic strips, and more specifically, the comic
strips found on pandyland.net, have an entirely unique set of conventions. The
dialogue and interactions that take place between Finlay and Simon tend to be
very crude and vulgar, such as, “I’ve got a really horrible rash on my winky,”
partnered with the image of Simon with his hands down his pants; needless to
say, I do admit to laughing once or twice. These comic strips were very simple
in nature, from the personalities of the characters to the color scheme and
details within the images. They are intended for and appeal to an audience that
is likely very different from the previous genre, one that does not necessarily
have a specific educational, political, or religious background; that said,
however, the intended audience is certainly not people from a conservative or
traditional culture. The presentation of the comic strip in itself is specific
to the genre in that each strip is displayed in a series of three side-by-side
boxes, each containing an image of only two characters. A convention, perhaps
unique to a sub-genre of comic strips, is the random fashion in which the
interactions between the two characters are displayed; there is no storyline or
specific subject matter, but instead, an illogical sequence of events or (often
one-sided) conversations that occurs.
Quite similarly
to the conventions of a comic strip, memes are often crude and vulgar in their
humor. Their goal is usually to make fun of or speak down upon another person in
an amusing, unconventional manner. Memes each consist of an animated or
photographed face, bordered on top and bottom by bold, white letters, all
within a small square. The words and phrases made up by these letters contain
high levels of sarcasm and are usually lacking in the areas of spelling and
grammar; two popular memes begin with, “Y U NO…” and “not sure if…,” both of
which fail to use correct grammar and are not fully-formulated thoughts. Memes are
meant to be comical and therefore, are geared toward a general audience that is
likely intent on finding humor within them; however, meme audiences are usually
looking specifically for memes or come across them on a social networking site.
That said, the intended audience is likely to be a younger, internet-savvy
generation.
Given the
websites used above (pdos.csail.mit.edu, pandyland.net, and memegenerator.net)
and their creations, a better understanding of genre can be achieved by
analyzing each unique set of conventions and patterns. As people learn these
patterns, they are able to apply their knowledge while analyzing a certain
text, movie, song, etc. and develop a tighter grasp on what it is that embodies
a genre.
Wow! So first, I’d like to recognize your fantastic use of diction. From reading other PB1B’s, I have noticed that we all easily fall into the trap of using the same words over and over again so, as a reader, I really appreciate that. Second, your analysis of all three generators is incredibly thorough and really seeks to understand how each convention ties together to form the genre to its very core.
ReplyDeleteLastly, this may seem random, but I really loved this sentence: “…there is no storyline or specific subject matter, but instead, an illogical sequence of events or (often one-sided) conversations that occurs.” It more than captures the entirety of the combined conventions. Great work!
Emmi,
ReplyDeleteI dig your blog aesthetic. The aqua blue/green make it a bit (JUST a bit) hard to see the black text (ie your writing), but it gives off a very light and easygoing feeling. I’m nice and relaxed now. :) Your adventures sound very interesting. You ought to consider turning them into a blog sometime (seriously).
PB1A: Excellent work on this. I thought that each of these thoughts was on-point: “ They have a tendency to be written in a serious tone, lacking any sort of comedy, romance, playfulness, or extreme detail … The authors are not novelists, lobbyists, or poets, and therefore, have no intentions of causing the reader to empathize with the subject or be persuaded to take action. The language is very precise so as to avoid confusion in what the question is asking for; however, the given information is not necessarily straightforward” Very smart observations. I also like how you provided a specific example—that’s almost always a great idea.
PB1B: As I mentioned in class, your purported lack of understanding on the content of the SciGen piece is—natural! It’s complete jibberish; it just looks/feels like a real-life “scholarly” article. You got the conventions down, and that’s what I was shooting for. You nailed the meme generator too: “Memes each consist of an animated or photographed face, bordered on top and bottom by bold, white letters, all within a small square.” Nice and specific.
You’re off to a fantastic start, Emmi. Keep the “smart train” rolling.
Grade for both PBs: 5/5
PB1A: “Check plus.”
PB1B: “Check plus.”
Z